From dc8e11d48894296762f38892462fd7c478c1b8ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://me.yahoo.com/a/g3Ccalpj0NhN566pHbUl6i9QF0QEkrhlfPM-#b1c14" Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:09:20 +0100 Subject: update for rename of open_issues/automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit.mdwn --- .../ext2fs_libports_reference_counting_assertion.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/ext2fs_libports_reference_counting_assertion.mdwn b/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/ext2fs_libports_reference_counting_assertion.mdwn index 2b9f28e8..7483e847 100644 --- a/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/ext2fs_libports_reference_counting_assertion.mdwn +++ b/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/ext2fs_libports_reference_counting_assertion.mdwn @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ With that patch in place, the assertion failure is seen more often. reproducing + a call trace or core would be best, but i'm not even sure we can get that easily lol -[[automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit]]. +[[service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/automatic_backtraces_when_assertions_hit]]. # IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-10-09 -- cgit v1.2.3