From cc2e32520ca1458f8f00fac77021c9758d0421c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: guy fleury iteriteka Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 12:12:17 +0200 Subject: remove gnumach_i686 issue. * open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn: delete it. Message-Id: <20210102101217.8372-12-gfleury@disroot.org> --- open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn | 26 -------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn diff --git a/open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn b/open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn deleted file mode 100644 index b34df73b..00000000 --- a/open_issues/gnumach_i686.mdwn +++ /dev/null @@ -1,26 +0,0 @@ -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] - -[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable -id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this -document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or -any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant -Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license -is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation -License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] - -[[!tag open_issue_gnumach]] - - -# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-07-05 - - we could use a gnumach-i686 too - how would you compile gnumach as i686 variant btw? add - -march=.. or something like that in CFLAGS? - yes - at least we'll get some cmovs :) - - -## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-07-07 - - it was rejected in the past because we didn't think it would bring - real performance benefit, but it actually may -- cgit v1.2.3