From 52eee1fe323462e6e8ffa8a93dd4a7e684702237 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Grant Bowman Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:33:38 +0000 Subject: none --- Hurd/ExtTwoSize.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Hurd/ExtTwoSize.mdwn b/Hurd/ExtTwoSize.mdwn index c8dad3d4..ec39781f 100644 --- a/Hurd/ExtTwoSize.mdwn +++ b/Hurd/ExtTwoSize.mdwn @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ This is a very common question. Many people have problems with the partition limit on Ext2 filesystems being very small by current standards. It feels smaller all the time as people have larger disks and often larger filesystems. It's worth mentioning that 64-bit machines (ia64, alpha) will not have this limitation. -Note that, while the official CVS sources still suffer of this problem, recent (as of 2007) Debian GNU Hurd distributions **do not have this limit anymore**. Be happy. +Note that, while the official CVS sources still suffer of this problem, recent (as of 2007) Debian GNU Hurd distributions **do not have this limit anymore**. Be happy. [July 2007 from debian-hurd](http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2007/07/msg00087.html) * From the Hurd FAQ: [partition limit](http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/faq.en.html#q2-6) -- cgit v1.2.3