| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open_issues/xen_lseek: ... here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See thread starting at id:"87k482r8rr.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn
|
|
|
|
This reverts parts of commit 34536d4be249af5a150bbc4811181bf106f703a6.
|
|
Don't use "GNU/Hurd" when talking about things not realated to
distributions -- as explained in this very same news article... :-)
BTW, "The GNU/Hurd" is *never* correct -- just like nobody would say
"the GNU/Linux", or "the GNU". Only "the Hurd" is special in this
regard. (And sometimes "the GNU Hurd" is also OK, but it only fits in
some contexts! Often just "GNU Hurd" is more appropriate as well.)
|
|
As suggested by Arne.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Microkernel-Based Operating Systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The announcement adds no real value: XFree86 has been available before, and
X.Org is a fork of it, so it would be surprising if the functionality had been
lost (and re-introduced).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
