| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported by Graeme Roberts <chee@snaek.org> on 2010-01-12 via Karl Berry.
|
|
sendmail vs. ikiwiki patch.
|
|
directories.
|
|
possible from flubber.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almost completely rewrote most of the description, dropping the
politics, and focusing on the points I have been trying to emphasise in
my recent Hurd presentations.
|
|
purposes.
|
|
As we don't focus our participation on code produced during the summer,
partial code is also not the major consideration when a project fails.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mostly based on suggestions from tschwinge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
status page.
|
|
|
|
community/gsoc/2009: Tidy up.
hurd/translator/unionfs: Mention that unionmount has been worked on as a GSoC 2009 project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hopefully this will make it somewhat clearer that we are serious about
this, but without sounding too accusatory...
|
|
being mandatory
|
|
Drop the second sentence, which explicitely talks about raising
awareness about the Hurd -- I fear it makes it sound like we treat GSoC
as some kind of advertising program...
|
|
keep students motivated
Make it explicit that we do that *in addition* to the continued IRC
meetings -- it's not the major bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Somewhat different question; updates for last year; and extra question for
explicit head count.
Generally change emphasis of text from praising participation as a distinct
organisation, to praising our own past achievments.
|
