1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/wayland.mdwn b/open_issues/wayland.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..67f78b1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/open_issues/wayland.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
+
+[[!tag open_issue_porting]]
+
+IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-18:
+
+    <antrik> Wayland should be very portable. all the system dependencies are
+      in the infrastructure, such as DRI
+    <antrik> we have had a DRI task (for X.Org) for years
+    <antrik> (in fact I would be the right person to implement this,
+      considering my background -- by quite frankly, I doubt I'll ever do it)
+    <tschwinge> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/Hurd_Porting
+
+IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-20:
+
+    <youlysses> Is wayland something that will be semi-easy to port to the
+      hurd? I saw GNOME is heading in this direction.
+    <pinotree> wayland at the moment is linux only
+    <tschwinge> youlysses: A DRI implementation will be needed.
+    <pinotree> that, and libdrm compiling
+    <youlysses> So it will take some work ... but theres no *HUGE* design
+      decison that would inhibit it?
+    <pinotree> i know it uses epoll, for instance
+    <tschwinge> youlysses: I cannot judge how complex a DRI system is, and how
+      much needs to be designed vs. implemented.