diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn')
| -rw-r--r-- | open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn | 37 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn b/open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..1d0e92a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_hurd]] + +IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-08-11 + + < youpi> in which error cases a reply port will actually have been consumed + by mach_msg ? + < youpi> it seems at least MACH_SEND_NOTIFY_IN_PROGRESS do? + < braunr> + http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/gnumach-doc/Message-Send.html#Message-Send + < braunr> "These return codes imply that the message was returned to the + caller with a pseudo-receive operation: " + < braunr> isn't it what you're looking for ? + < youpi> well, it's hard to tell from the name + < youpi> I don't know what "pseudo-receiv operation" means + < braunr> it's described below + < youpi> ew + < braunr> it looks close enough to a normal receive to assume it consumes + the reply port + < youpi> so it's even more complex than what I thought + < youpi> well, no, it returns the right + < youpi> actually the error I'm getting is MACH_RCV_INVALID_NAME + < youpi> which I guess means the sending part succeeded + < youpi> the case at stake is proc/mgt.c: S_proc_exception_raise() + < youpi> when the proc_exception_raise() forward fails + < youpi> currently we always return 0, but if proc_exception_raise() + actually managed to send the message, the reply port was consumed and + MIG_NO_REPLY should be returned instead |