1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/mach-defpager_vs_defpager.mdwn b/open_issues/mach-defpager_vs_defpager.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f03bc67f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/open_issues/mach-defpager_vs_defpager.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
+
+[[!tag open_issue_gnumach open_issue_hurd]]
+
+IRC, freenode, #hurd, end of May/beginning of June 2010
+
+    <cfhammar> whats the difference between mach-defpager and defpager?
+    <cfhammar> i'm guessing defpager is a hurdish version that uses libstore
+      but was never finished or something
+    <cfhammar> found an interesting thread about it:
+      http://mirror.libre.fm/hurd/list/msg01232.html
+    <slpz> antrik: an interesting thread, indeed :-)
+    <pochu> slpz: btw is mach-defpager linked statically but not called
+      mach-defpager.static on purpose?
+    <slpz> antrik: also, I can confirm that mach-defpager needs a complete
+      rewrite ;-)
+    <slpz> pochu: I think the original defpager was launched by serverboot
+    <slpz> pochu: that could be the reason to have it static, like ext2fs
+    <slpz> and since there's no need to execute it again during the normal
+      operation of the system, they probably decided to not create a
+      dynamically linked version
+    <slpz> (but I'm just guessing)
+    <slpz> of perhaps they wanted to prevent mach-defpager from the need of
+      reading libraries, since it's used when memory is really scarce (guessing
+      again)