diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn')
| -rw-r--r-- | news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn | 33 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn b/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn index cbf039b0..14578e83 100644 --- a/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn +++ b/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn @@ -95,4 +95,37 @@ slashdot and phoronix did some [performance tests of the Hurd][phorperf], [phorperf]: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=debian_gnu_hurd&num=1 +--- + +IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-08-24: + + < ArneBab> hurd related: I now think you were right, antrik: the hurd + rumors don’t belong into the news (tschwinge) + < antrik> ArneBab: you mean the postscriptum as a whole, or just the wild + rumours part?... + < ArneBab> the whole PS + < ArneBab> it should rather go into a blog post + < ArneBab> (in the wiki) + < antrik> hm... I don't think I agree + < ArneBab> why? + < antrik> apparently there is a number of people following the news now, + and apparently many of them misread some statements... it makes sense to + use the same channel for clarifying them I'd say + < ArneBab> hm, ok + < ArneBab> how would you select the part to include? + < antrik> roughly speaking, I'd include everything that actually relates to + the previous news that were misunderstood + < antrik> and drop all unrelated speculations that popped up + < antrik> BTW, it *might* be useful perhaps to actually update the original + news posting with the clarifications?... + < ArneBab> we can’t do that without breaking some peoples RSS feeds + < antrik> note that there is another aspect to consider: the fact that + several news sites picked it up is indeed genuine news by itself... + < ArneBab> that’s right, yes + < antrik> will it really break anything? from what I heard so far it just + means they will see the posting as new again, which would actually make + sense in this case... + < antrik> but I don't insist if you think it's too risky :-) + < antrik> just an idea + --> |