diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'hurd/ng/history.mdwn')
-rw-r--r-- | hurd/ng/history.mdwn | 50 |
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/hurd/ng/history.mdwn b/hurd/ng/history.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..652bccf3 --- /dev/null +++ b/hurd/ng/history.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +[[meta copyright="Copyright © 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[meta license="""[[toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled +[[GNU_Free_Documentation_License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +The idea of using [[microkernel/L4]] as a [[microkernel]] for a +[[Hurd_system|hurd]] was initially voiced in the [[Hurd_community|community]] +by Okuji Yoshinori. He created the [[mailing_lists/l4-hurd]] mailing list in +November 2000. It does not appear that he got any further than simply +suggesting it as an alternative to [[microkernel/Mach]] and doing some reading. + +Neal Walfield started the original Hurd/L4 port while at Karlsruhe in 2002. +He explains: + +> My intention was to adapt the Hurd to exploit L4's concepts and intended +> [[design_pattern]]s; it was not to simply provide a Mach +> [[compatibility_layer]] on top of L4. When I left Karlsruhe, I no longer had +> access to [[microkernel/l4/Pistachio]] as I was unwilling to sign an NDA. +> Although the specification was available, the Karlsruhe group only [released +> their code in May +> 2003](https://lists.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de/pipermail/l4ka/2003-May/000345.html). +> Around this time, Marcus began hacking on Pistachio. He created a relatively +> complete run-time. I didn't really become involved again until the second +> half of 2004, after I complete by Bachelors degree. + +> Before Marcus and I considered [[microkernel/Coyotos]], we had already +> rejected some parts of the Hurd's design. The [[resource_management_problems]] +> were what prompted me to look at L4. Also, some of the problems with +> [[translator]]s were already well-known to us. (For a more detailed +> description of the problems we have identified, see our [[critique]] in the +> 2007 July's SIGOPS OSR. We have also written a forward-looking +> [[position_paper]].) + +> We visited Jonathan Shapiro at Hopkins in January 2006. This resulted in a +> number of discussions, some quite influential, and not always in a way which +> aligned our position with that of Jonathan's. This was particularly true of +> a number of security issues. + +A lange number of discussion threads can be found in the archives of the +[[mailing_lists/l4-hurd]] mailing list. + +> Hurd-NG, as we originally called it, was an attempt to articulate the system +> that we had come to envision in terms of interfaces and description of the +> system's structure. The new name was selected, if I recall correctly, as it +> clearly wasn't the Hurd nor the Hurd based on L4. |