diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'hurd/ng/designgoals.mdwn')
| -rw-r--r-- | hurd/ng/designgoals.mdwn | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/hurd/ng/designgoals.mdwn b/hurd/ng/designgoals.mdwn index 5dbd7018..d04007c2 100644 --- a/hurd/ng/designgoals.mdwn +++ b/hurd/ng/designgoals.mdwn @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ ## <a name="The_Position_Paper"> The Position Paper </a> -_Improving Usability via Access Decomposition and Policy Reļ¬nement_ tries to capture technical objectives. As has been stated by Neal in [2], these are a number of scenarios we are interested in addressing: +The [[position_paper]] tries to capture technical objectives. As has been +stated by Neal in [2], these are a number of scenarios we are interested in +addressing: * security: programs are not users; they should be constrained according to the user's intents * resource management @@ -30,7 +32,7 @@ Extensibility has often been a strong argument to support the multiserver approa However, I do believe there are benefits in multiserver environments you cannot get in a monolithic one, namely enhanced security and stability through protection boundaries. Also, whilst wanting to become adopted as general purpose OS, ngHurd still strives to allow for research also, so even according to the above-referenced paper extensibility is to be one of its goals. -Therefore, I'd want to propose to weaken the impact of extensibility on the design, by lowering it to the category "Regular Goals". -- [[Main/TomBachmann]] - 13 Dec 2006 +Therefore, I'd want to propose to weaken the impact of extensibility on the design, by lowering it to the category "Regular Goals". -- [[TomBachmann]] - 13 Dec 2006 ## <a name="Regular_Goals"> Regular Goals </a> @@ -49,5 +51,3 @@ Therefore, I'd want to propose to weaken the impact of extensibility on the desi * [1] <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/2005-11/msg00037.html> * [2] <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/2007-01/msg00122.html> - --- [[Main/TomBachmann]] - 29 Apr 2006 |