diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'faq')
-rw-r--r-- | faq/how_many_developers.mdwn | 25 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | faq/sharing_the_user_space.mdwn | 23 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn | 27 |
3 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/faq/how_many_developers.mdwn b/faq/how_many_developers.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a553df21 --- /dev/null +++ b/faq/how_many_developers.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!meta title="How many developers are working on the GNU Hurd?"]] + +Not many. One handful work on it in their free time, and another two +handful do help with [[Debian GNU/Hurd|hurd/running/debian]] and +[[hurd/running/Arch_Hurd]] packaging. Also, an additional handful of +former developers are still availble for answering technical questions, +but are not really participating in the current development anymore. + +For reaching out to new developers, we're participating in [[Google's +Summer of Code program|community/gsoc]]. Likewise, any interested party +(*you*!) are very welcome to start [[contributing]]. Mentoring is +possible, too, to help you get started. + +Continue reading some speculation about [[why so few developers]] are working +on the GNU Hurd. diff --git a/faq/sharing_the_user_space.mdwn b/faq/sharing_the_user_space.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ec880827 --- /dev/null +++ b/faq/sharing_the_user_space.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +*Question:* Could it be possible to have a system installation where you can +dual-boot using either the [[Linux]] kernel, or the GNU Hurd, so that +everything but the kernel is shared? + +*Answer:* Given that both Linux and GNU Hurd are using the [[ELF]] binary +format, this could indeed be made possible, if all programs agreed to rely on +only one abstraction layer, for example the standard C library ([[glibc]]). +(Additionally, for example for [[system call]]s that are not covered by glibc +calls, you'd need to be able to reliably trap and emulate these.) However, +Linux' and the GNU Hurd's [[ABI]]'s have sufficiently diverged, so that this is +not easy to do. That's why you can't currently install a system in this way, +but you need a separate installation of the userspace suited for the Linux +kernel, or the GNU Hurd. diff --git a/faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn b/faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a2740abc --- /dev/null +++ b/faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!meta title="Why are there so few developers working on the GNU +Hurd?"]] + +[[There aren't working a lot of people on the GNU +Hurd|how_many_developers]]. Why is this? + +We can only speculate. One major problem might be that the +[[architectural benefits|advantages]] are generally perceived as very +abstract, with little practical benefits. We don't have many tools to +present actually making use of the possibilities. + +Another reason is that it's been taking too long. Most people don't +believe it will ever be ready for production use, and thus would consider +involvement a waste of time. This latter point is invalid, of course, as +learning can never be a waste of time. The same holds for the +[[challenges]] raised by the GNU Hurd -- we can only learn and improve +upon working on them. |