diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'faq')
| -rw-r--r-- | faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn | 19 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn | 25 |
2 files changed, 26 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn b/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn index a54822c5..4490b7cb 100644 --- a/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn +++ b/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this @@ -30,20 +30,3 @@ striving for total POSIX compliance -- and the high-level programs (that is, their users) may not even notice this, but we would avoid a lot of overhead that comes with wrapping the [[Hurd interfaces|hurd/interface]] to be POSIX compliant. - - -\#hurd IRC channel on Freenode, 2010-12-21: - - <antrik> tschwinge: the writeup ignores the fact that POSIX compatibility - is not only for applications, but also for users familiar with the UNIX - environment - <antrik> also, I still don't buy the fact that most software is not written - for POSIX. even if assuming that GNOME programs don't use POSIX (which is - only half true), there is a lot of other software in a system that is - just as important, though less visible - <antrik> (server software, startup system, device management, automation, - ...) - <antrik> tschwinge: BTW, I meant to (and partially did) write a blog - article on this topic -- but I didn't get around to finish it... - -[[!tag open_issue_documentation]] diff --git a/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn b/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0d722c9e --- /dev/null +++ b/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_documentation]] + +\#hurd IRC channel on Freenode, 2010-12-21: + + <antrik> tschwinge: the writeup ignores the fact that POSIX compatibility + is not only for applications, but also for users familiar with the UNIX + environment + <antrik> also, I still don't buy the fact that most software is not written + for POSIX. even if assuming that GNOME programs don't use POSIX (which is + only half true), there is a lot of other software in a system that is + just as important, though less visible + <antrik> (server software, startup system, device management, automation, + ...) + <antrik> tschwinge: BTW, I meant to (and partially did) write a blog + article on this topic -- but I didn't get around to finish it... |