diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn')
| -rw-r--r-- | faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn | 19 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn b/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn index a54822c5..4490b7cb 100644 --- a/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn +++ b/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this @@ -30,20 +30,3 @@ striving for total POSIX compliance -- and the high-level programs (that is, their users) may not even notice this, but we would avoid a lot of overhead that comes with wrapping the [[Hurd interfaces|hurd/interface]] to be POSIX compliant. - - -\#hurd IRC channel on Freenode, 2010-12-21: - - <antrik> tschwinge: the writeup ignores the fact that POSIX compatibility - is not only for applications, but also for users familiar with the UNIX - environment - <antrik> also, I still don't buy the fact that most software is not written - for POSIX. even if assuming that GNOME programs don't use POSIX (which is - only half true), there is a lot of other software in a system that is - just as important, though less visible - <antrik> (server software, startup system, device management, automation, - ...) - <antrik> tschwinge: BTW, I meant to (and partially did) write a blog - article on this topic -- but I didn't get around to finish it... - -[[!tag open_issue_documentation]] |