diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Mach/MicroKernelFUD.mdwn')
| -rw-r--r-- | Mach/MicroKernelFUD.mdwn | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Mach/MicroKernelFUD.mdwn b/Mach/MicroKernelFUD.mdwn index 1961f6d2..0ee5035c 100644 --- a/Mach/MicroKernelFUD.mdwn +++ b/Mach/MicroKernelFUD.mdwn @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ # <a name="The_Microkernel_Experiment_is_Go"> The Microkernel Experiment is Going On </a> -by [Wolfgang J�hrling](mailto:wolfgang AT pro-linux DOT de) and [Jeroen Dekkers](mailto:jeroen AT dekkers DOT cx) +by [Wolfgang Jährling](mailto:wolfgang AT pro-linux DOT de) and [Jeroen Dekkers](mailto:jeroen AT dekkers DOT cx) -This article is a response to an [earlier article](http://www.linuxjournal.com/print.php?sid=6105) by Miles Nordin in Linux Journal, where he expressed his personal feelings about microkernels and monolithic kernels. We will try to present a different point of view. Of course, we are also biased, as we are both young hackers who try to turn [the GNU Hurd](http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/) into a software useful for everyday-work; for those who don't know it (yes, we're abusing this article as an advertisement): The Hurd is a collection of Daemons, currently running on top of the Mach microkernel and providing a replacement for the Unix kernel together with the GNU C Library. +This article is a response to an [earlier article](http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/6105/print) by Miles Nordin in Linux Journal, where he expressed his personal feelings about microkernels and monolithic kernels. We will try to present a different point of view. Of course, we are also biased, as we are both young hackers who try to turn [the GNU Hurd](http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/) into a software useful for everyday-work; for those who don't know it (yes, we're abusing this article as an advertisement): The Hurd is a collection of Daemons, currently running on top of the Mach microkernel and providing a replacement for the Unix kernel together with the GNU C Library. Miles Nordin claimed that microkernels are dead already. But this is not completely true. The first generation of microkernels, which were in fact no real microkernels, are dead. But there is a new generation, which uses a radically different strategy than the original (so-called) microkernels. Thus, microkernels are still a research topic, and today they look more promising than ever before. By now, this is just something we claim, but read on, and you'll find out why we do so. @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ If you are interested in research about the performance of microkernel based sys ---- -Copyright (C) 2002 Wolfgang J�hrling <br /> Copyright (C) 2002 Jeroen Dekkers +Copyright (C) 2002 Wolfgang Jährling <br /> Copyright (C) 2002 Jeroen Dekkers Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. |