diff options
-rw-r--r-- | contributing/web_pages/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn | 12 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/contributing/web_pages/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn b/contributing/web_pages/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn index 0415db8b..28e3cc9a 100644 --- a/contributing/web_pages/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn +++ b/contributing/web_pages/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn @@ -22,12 +22,20 @@ else=" After our last *[[Quarter of the Hurd|news/2011-q2]]* has been picked up by a bunch of news sites, blogs, and so on, discussions have been running all over the -net. <!-- probably good to link the actual articles? After this PS, we probably won't link them in the next regular news... --> +net ([lwn][], [reddit1][], [reddit2][], [h-online][], [slashdot][], [golem1][], [golem2][]). We are happy to see that there is considerable interest in the Hurd; but we also saw some misunderstandings, false rumors, and outdated information floating around. Thus we will try to clarify the situation regarding some of the more common misunderstandings. +[reddit1]: http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/j2ztr/rms_mlayout_finally_shout_its_alive_at_gnuhurd_thanks/ +[lwn]: http://lwn.net/Articles/451699/ +[h-online]: http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Hurd-Progresses-Debian-GNU-Hurd-by-end-o +[reddit2]: http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/ipxxt/debian_now_has_concrete_plans_to_bring_gnu_hurd/ +[golem1]: http://www.golem.de/1107/84947.html +[golem2]: http://www.golem.de/1108/85430.html +[slashdot]: http://news.slasd.h.ot.org/story/11/07/14/2141229/watch-out-linux-gnu-hurd-coming + * **Debian GNU Hurd works to become a port in Debian**: We plan to get into the next Debian release (Wheezy) as an additional port alongside GNU/Linux and GNU/kFreeBSD -- @@ -127,7 +135,7 @@ regarding some of the more common misunderstandings. which are currently the major bottleneck in most situations. Nevertheless, these results are a hint that the extra IPC required in microkernel systems - [doesn't necessarily hamper performace](http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.51.16) + [doesn't necessarily hamper performance](http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.51.16) quite as much as often believed. We are glad to see such solid benchmarks help dispell some of the myths around the Hurd :-) |