summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/open_issues/gnumach_memory_management.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>2012-03-17 12:31:07 +0100
committerThomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>2012-03-17 12:31:07 +0100
commit3bf27c93ac4de57623809b71517116d51465f0e1 (patch)
treeec3edc96d8a3639651e722b401bf677bc9505c68 /open_issues/gnumach_memory_management.mdwn
parent88ade4a03928041ad710594f3281b883528bc8ec (diff)
IRC bits.
Diffstat (limited to 'open_issues/gnumach_memory_management.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--open_issues/gnumach_memory_management.mdwn10
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/gnumach_memory_management.mdwn b/open_issues/gnumach_memory_management.mdwn
index c34d1200..d29e316c 100644
--- a/open_issues/gnumach_memory_management.mdwn
+++ b/open_issues/gnumach_memory_management.mdwn
@@ -2089,7 +2089,15 @@ There is a [[!FF_project 266]][[!tag bounty]] on this task.
<braunr> ou alors dans les .h ipc
-# IRC, freenode, #hurdfr, 2012-01-18
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-01-18
<braunr> does the slab branch need other reviews/reports before being
integrated ?
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-01-30
+
+ <braunr> youpi: do you have some idea about when you want to get the slab
+ branch in master ?
+ <youpi> I was considering as soon as mcsim gets his paper
+ <braunr> right