summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hurd/history
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>2009-02-17 01:57:35 +0100
committerThomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>2009-02-17 01:57:35 +0100
commit7eecc9b75ce4867597f2dc404182bb04f7fe2145 (patch)
tree93339073807a7cc76d25fa6bfce2a1673c3f8fc6 /hurd/history
parentf57755b84e4d352faab76bf7194768555a615596 (diff)
hurd/ng/resource_management_problems -> microkernel/mach/gnumach/open_issues/resource_management_problems
Diffstat (limited to 'hurd/history')
-rw-r--r--hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn11
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn b/hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn
index 03795dc4..d4daeefa 100644
--- a/hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn
+++ b/hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn
@@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ explains:
> Before Marcus and I considered [[microkernel/Coyotos]], we had already
> rejected some parts of the Hurd's design. The
-> [[ng/resource_management_problems]] were what prompted me to look at L4.
-> Also, some of the problems with [[translator]]s were already well-known to
-> us. (For a more detailed description of the problems we have identified, see
-> our [[critique]] in the 2007 July's SIGOPS OSR. We have also written a
-> forward-looking [[ng/position_paper]].)
+> [[microkernel/mach/gnumach/open_issues/resource_management_problems]] were
+> what prompted me to look at L4. Also, some of the problems with
+> [[translator]]s were already well-known to us. (For a more detailed
+> description of the problems we have identified, see our [[critique]] in the
+> 2007 July's SIGOPS OSR. We have also written a forward-looking
+> [[ng/position_paper]].)
> We visited Jonathan Shapiro at Hopkins in January 2006. This resulted in a
> number of discussions, some quite influential, and not always in a way which