summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hurd-and-linux.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>2010-12-13 17:11:51 +0100
committerThomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>2010-12-13 17:11:51 +0100
commit2d75167da62e3486836e5f1773e5f1ab06e43fe8 (patch)
treee44fc83e0b1419836d1b21652ad1d38b8d0af2c4 /hurd-and-linux.html
parent217998d56f5b6424a685f8c87f2c0e924d1c89da (diff)
parent5c5c16e265d8ef56b71f319885f32bf144bdea23 (diff)
Merge branch 'master' into external_pager_mechanism
Conflicts: microkernel/mach/external_pager_mechanism.mdwn
Diffstat (limited to 'hurd-and-linux.html')
-rw-r--r--hurd-and-linux.html49
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/hurd-and-linux.html b/hurd-and-linux.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..01b08aa1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hurd-and-linux.html
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2008, 2009 Free Software
+Foundation, Inc."]]
+
+[[!meta license="Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is
+permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved."]]
+
+[[!meta title="The Hurd and Linux"]]
+
+[[!tag stable_URL]]
+
+by <A HREF="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</A>.
+
+<P>
+People sometimes ask, ``Why did the FSF develop a new free kernel
+instead of using Linux?'' It's a reasonable question. The answer,
+briefly, is that that is not the question we faced.
+
+<P>
+When we started developing the Hurd in 1990, the question facing us
+was, ``How can we get a free kernel for the GNU system?'' There was
+no free Unix-like kernel then, and we knew of no other plan to write
+one. The only way we could expect to have a free kernel was to write
+it ourselves. So we started.
+
+<P>
+We heard about Linux after its release. At that time, the question
+facing us was, ``Should we cancel the Hurd project and use Linux
+instead?''
+
+<P>
+We heard that Linux was not at all portable (this may not be true
+today, but that's what we heard then). And we heard that Linux was
+architecturally on a par with the Unix kernel; our work was leading to
+something much more powerful.
+
+<P>
+Given the years of work we had already put into the Hurd, we decided
+to finish it rather than throw them away.
+
+<P>
+If we did face the question that people ask---if Linux were already
+available, and we were considering whether to start writing another
+kernel---we would not do it. Instead we would choose another project,
+something to do a job that no existing free software can do.
+
+<P>
+But we did start the Hurd, back then, and now we have made it work.
+We hope its superior architecture will make free operating systems
+more powerful.