none

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/TWiki/HurdWikiCopyrightDiscuss.mdwn b/TWiki/HurdWikiCopyrightDiscuss.mdwn
index 649302d1..992bce12 100644
--- a/TWiki/HurdWikiCopyrightDiscuss.mdwn
+++ b/TWiki/HurdWikiCopyrightDiscuss.mdwn
@@ -28,10 +28,6 @@ So what you are saying is basically this:
 2. We _can_ use content from the FSF (as long as we keep all copyright information, of course), but any content evolved from this is unusable for GNU manuals.
 3. Even if every newly registered user (and [[Main/TWikiGuest]] is disabled completely for the Hurd Web) agrees to our terms that agreement is useless without the _paper_ work.
 
-I must admit I was completely clueless about this. This makes me start thinking about a lot of code I've written where I've assigned the copyright to the FSF, then that code is useless too. Man, have I been naive...
-
-I have to take a moment to think about this. I've never thought about things in this way. When I do commercial work I've of course already signed my contract -- and that's a piece of paper. But I thought that electronic consent could be okey as well ... ouch, that hurd^Ht.
-
 Oh, there is of course all the RCS diffs ... would that help, if we would like to have the Wiki content in GNU manuals?
 
 -- [[Main/JoachimNilsson]] - 14 May 2002
@@ -39,7 +35,3 @@ Oh, there is of course all the RCS diffs ... would that help, if we would like t
 If you have papers signed by the contributors, then any Guest added words (less than 10 lines?) can be filtered out of the Wiki using RCS. This is acceptable for GNU code, if I recall correctly. You may have to re-writen certain portions of the Wiki to use FSF contributed work only, though.
 
 -- [[Main/SimonLaw]] - 16 May 2002
-
-Moved this thread to here from [[HurdTWikiDiscuss]].
-
--- [[Main/JoachimNilsson]] - 16 May 2002