diff options
author | Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@web.de> | 2009-06-12 12:59:55 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@web.de> | 2009-06-12 12:59:55 +0200 |
commit | 46cab2ba91659d8569d31d05dab3fcc1f6551a47 (patch) | |
tree | 0acf56283d7af4d2645916059cb65816a9339022 | |
parent | d38cdb58180e61e1e4184b3c2fcaa34527d48bb6 (diff) |
status: Added antriks statement about his experience during the last two years.
-rw-r--r-- | hurd/status.mdwn | 37 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/hurd/status.mdwn b/hurd/status.mdwn index 1122b703..8b95534e 100644 --- a/hurd/status.mdwn +++ b/hurd/status.mdwn @@ -60,4 +60,41 @@ already expect delays; to disappoint them in this way as well would be unfortunate. Moreover, it would lessen the possibility that they would want to try the Hurd again in the future. +## Usability status 2009-06-11 +*(This text is taken from two emails posted on the [[bug-hurd mailinglist|mailing_lists]] +by Olaf Buddenhagen)* + +I have been using the Hurd for most of my everyday work for some two +years now. Most of the time it's pretty OK, but occasionally programs +crash, or the screen session dies, or even the whole system. Also, +various programs simply don't work at all, or don't work in certain +situations. + +While I have learned to work around many of these issues, I don't +believe I would be able to use it as my primary system, without having a +GNU/Linux system running in parallel, as a fallback for all the stuff +that doesn't work on the Hurd. + +[...] + +One particular problem for desktop use is the fact that while X does +work, it works very poorly -- it's not only slow and jerky all the time, +but also tends to lock up completely. (At least with the local socket +transport... Haven't tried whether forcing TCP works better.) + +Note that while many of the stability problems are simply bugs to fix, +the system will still be very fragile in the absence of these -- a +simple port leak is sufficient to kill it within seconds. This is +something that can't be easily solved. Properly fixing this will require +a sound resource accounting framework, i.e. very fundamental changes to +the system... Though I tend to believe that it could be improved at +least partially, at the expense of flexibility, by enforcing certain +fixed limits on users, processes etc. like other UNIX systems do. + +[...] + +Anyways, if you want to revive the Gentoo GNU/Hurd port, that would be +great! Unlike a few years back when it was first attempted, the system +is stable enough under load nowadays, to make a source-based +distribution actually feasible... |