diff options
author | antrik <antrik@users.sf.net> | 2009-03-13 12:57:11 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | antrik <antrik@users.sf.net> | 2009-03-13 12:59:36 +0100 |
commit | 362b2a12a5a5d664988ffb51f66c6e1b83f84764 (patch) | |
tree | fb70150b0df10695b7bb2cbc234b8ccaaa018cc5 | |
parent | 89cd5c5f3bf5d909ae4097f0019c37e8e5cc7edf (diff) |
Added DRM porting to Xorg GSoC ideas list
This is not really a good project description, as it's not very specific
about what work is actually required (I lack the knowledge for that) --
but I gues it doesn't hurt to offer it nevertheless...
-rw-r--r-- | community/gsoc/xorg_ideas.mdwm | 39 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/community/gsoc/xorg_ideas.mdwm b/community/gsoc/xorg_ideas.mdwm index 513765cc..0899d20c 100644 --- a/community/gsoc/xorg_ideas.mdwm +++ b/community/gsoc/xorg_ideas.mdwm @@ -66,3 +66,42 @@ shouldn't be terribly hard either. Exercise: Try fixing <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?21000>, or perhaps some other minor issue with X on the Hurd. + + +## Initial work on porting DRM to GNU Hurd + +The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) is a kernel driver component taking care of +graphics hardware access. Originally, it only took care of the 3D acceleration +unit, and was used mostly by the DRI (Direct Rendering Infrastructure) in Mesa. + +About two years ago, the developers came to the conclusion that a more robust +and functional graphics stack requires the kernel driver to take care of other +graphics access as well: mode setting in particular. (Essentially what the old +KGI project proposed, see <http://www.kgi-project.org>.) Also, with the new GEM +interface, the DRM now takes care of graphics memory management as well. + +With the new responsibilities, the DRM is no longer an optional addon for fast +3D support, but a central component of the graphics stack. It needs to be +implemented by any operating system that wants good Xorg driver support in the +future. (Moreover, it is now also useful outside the context of Xorg.) + +The Hurd implementation of DRM will be somewhat special, as -- following the +microkernel idea -- we want to run the drivers as priviledged user space server +processes, rather than actual kernel modules. + +This task is about doing the first steps for porting the DRM to the Hurd. This +can be done by taking one of the existing DRM modesetting drivers (Intel or +Radeon), trying to get parts of it running as a Hurd server, and +porting/implementing necessary pieces of the general DRM framework as needed +along the way. + +It is probably not realistic to get the driver fully working over the summer. +The goal however is to get at least some parts going. + +This task will require obtaining a considerable amount of knowledge about the +Hurd and Mach (especially things like virtual memory management) -- it goes +deep into system internals. Previous experience with operating system and/or +graphics driver development would definitely be helpful. + +Exercise: Try to get some part of the driver compiling on the Hurd, using stubs +for any system-specific functionality. |