[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] [[!tag open_issue_porting]] IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-18: Wayland should be very portable. all the system dependencies are in the infrastructure, such as DRI we have had a DRI task (for X.Org) for years (in fact I would be the right person to implement this, considering my background -- by quite frankly, I doubt I'll ever do it) http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/Hurd_Porting IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-20: Is wayland something that will be semi-easy to port to the hurd? I saw GNOME is heading in this direction. wayland at the moment is linux only youlysses: A DRI implementation will be needed. that, and libdrm compiling So it will take some work ... but theres no *HUGE* design decison that would inhibit it? i know it uses epoll, for instance youlysses: I cannot judge how complex a DRI system is, and how much needs to be designed vs. implemented.