[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]

[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]

[[!tag open_issue_hurd]]

From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Subject: rm -fr slowness

I have always been surprised by the slowness of a mere rm -fr. Looking a
bit inside, I see that diskfs_dirremove_hard() calls diskfs_file_update
(dp, 1) (as does diskfs_truncate, diskfs_direnter_hard, and
diskfs_dirrewrite_hard). diskfs_file_update then calls pager_sync on
the pager, which thus writes back the whole ext2fs pager!

This sounds a bit excessive to me, an unlink could just record it in
memory and actually sync later.  Also, the wait flag is set, so we
really waits for all I/Os, which basically means strictly serializing
file removals: remove one file, wait for the disk to have done it
(~10ms), remove the next one, etc.  I guess this is for safety reasons
against crashes, but isn't the sync option there for such kind of