[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] [[!meta title="libpthread: __pthread_enqueue: Assertion `thread->prevp == 0' failed"]] [[!tag open_issue_libpthread]] IRC, OFTC, #debian-hurd, 2011-10-21: [Python testsuite] [169/340/1] test_logging python: /home/pino/sources/hurd/hurd-20110519/./libpthread/pthread/pt-internal.h:109: __pthread_enqueue: Assertion `thread->prevp == 0' failed. sigh IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-10-21: am i missing anything, or in libpthread the __pthread_threads list does not ever has elements removed from it? ... thus potentially causing "./libpthread/pthread/pt-internal.h:109: __pthread_enqueue: Assertion `thread->prevp == 0' failed." because threads can be appended on __pthread_dealloc() to the __pthread_free_threads list as well? maybe reusing the same next+prevp pointers in the __pthread struct for more than one list at the same time isn't a good idea... 2011-10-23: pinotree: I don't understand the relation between thread->prevp != 0 and the __pthread_threads list the list never has elements removed indeed, since libpthread never frees __pthread structures apparently youpi: ye sorry, that relation is indeed nonsense in which condition did you get prevp != 0 i wa trying to find some explaination for the "thread->prevp == 0" assertion in the _queue function ? *was it's not obvious to me how libpthread makes sure the various cond/mutex/rwlock make sure that it's not queued several times yeah apparently prevp/next are used for lists of held waitcond/mutex/rwlock and free threads