[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] [[!tag open_issue_hurd]] # IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-07-15 is there a libnetfs based translator that supports passive translators? I don't see any at the top of my head, only with active ones such as hostmux I suspected as much since as far as I can tell libnetfs lacks some bits to make that even work teythoon: the problem with passive translators is persistence well, it's easy to store volatile passive translators in a libnetfs server but usually, there is no backing store for them ext2fs is the only one actually providing space to store their command line sure, but at least file_get_translator needs to work so that procfs can serve a mounts node silly idea but don't you want to directly add it to the procfs translator ? no, I think it's useful on its own ok then you may need to add the required support it even doubles as normal command line tool yes, I almost got it... or so I hope ;) ok also, netfs_get_translator exists, so not supporting that feels like a bug to me could also be useful for a potential devfs translator yes uh, the code duplication in lib*fs is really bad :/ the code is mostly similar, though they have diverged and many little things are different so diffing them is very noisy stuff like file names or identifiers and I cannot figure out why my shiny passive translators are not started :/ % showtrans tmp/mounts /hurd/mtab.fixed / % wc --bytes tmp/mounts 0 tmp/mounts and no mtab translator around either [[hurd/translator/mtab/discussion]].