[[meta copyright="Copyright © 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] [[meta license="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled [[GNU_Free_Documentation_License|/fdl]]."]] # How cool it would be if the email becomes similar to snail mail? ## Let see how the snail mail works * You write the letter with a pen and paper * You write the "To" address * Post it -> Put it in a Post Box ## How Email works * You have your email client (and there comes the limitation, you can't use your favourite editor) * Fill in destination email address * Send it (May be a send button or a keyboard shortcut) ## What are the problems If you want to use a wordprocessor for sending email, it should implement a feature like mail merge, suppose it doesn't have such a feature then? You copy and paste it to your email client and if it doesn't support HTML? Well you have work arounds for all these, but how cool it would be if you have something like this: * You create a file, use any wordprocessor or text editor. * Right click and see the properties * Set the "To" field * Drag it to the Post Box icon on your panel next to Trash ## How can we implement it? An SMTP translator which uses extended atributes ## Comments IRC Logs about the discussion on #hurd >>>>>>> 5384ccd0a47e900fbdae993143110538248517a2:emailfs.mdwn j4v4m4n: isn't the HHG a good enough libtrivfs tutorial? the problem I have with mail, blog, ..., translators is that you want to save mails before sending them, so you can't edit directly into the translator manuel, may be we want a simpler one, all of us are beginners except AB they're not stream-based so unless you save it into memory and wait for "sync" to send mails, it doesn't seem well suited who's AB? manuel, create any file with your favourite editor and copy it to the directory where SMTP translator is sitting manuel, Anand Babu sure, but how is that better than sending it via the "mail" command then? except it's less hype, of course. manuel, http://savannah.gnu.org/users/ab manuel, it would be cool :-) still not convinced :) * schlesix (n=thomas@xdsl-81-173-230-219.netcologne.de) has joined #hurd manuel, set up SMTP translator on the desktop and may be add it next to the Trash :-) manuel, have a nice postbox icon manuel, drag your files to it manuel, it would be closer to the real world and snail mail j4v4m4n: To whom do they go? bvk: the file must be preformatted, probably bvk, in snail mail you will write to address on top of the envelop, right? j4v4m4n: yeah well, it could make sense in a desktop envronment bvk, here we can have it as the first line of the file not sure j4v4m4n: i never used snail :( manuel, that is what I have in mind * j4v4m4n like snail mail that email bvk: you never sent a mail via snail mail?! :) * j4v4m4n like snail mail more than email manuel: nope :( whats that btw? manuel, or why not have it as the file property itself?? manuel: you know its first time i hear it *snail mail* :(( bvk, the normal mails which a postman delivers :-) manuel, you create a file text, open document or whatver format j4v4m4n: I'm quite sure it'd make things more complicated in the end, using file properties, dragging files etc. manuel, righ click and see properties and set the to field Oh, these english words... :X manuel, we can use the xtended atributes manuel, which really showcase the power of hurd manuel, it becomes closer to the real world actually, is X working on hurd? bvk, well it used to work and the new Xorg release has som bvk, well it used to work and the new Xorg release has some broken packages bvk, if you use an old snapshot repository it will work (xorg 6.9) * marco_g (n=marco@gnu/the-hurd/marco) has joined #hurd hi marco_g, hi * bvk watching MIT lecture video on 'structure and interpretation of computer programs' bvk: yeah, X was ported on GNU/Hurd five-six years ago or so manuel, see http://hurd.in/bin/view/Main/EmailFS manuel, add your comments, if you like j4v4m4n: how would you convert the .odt to a mail? manuel, attachment with an empty mail? that won't get through *most* spam filters :) manuel, or may be convert it to HTML well converting it to text or HTML would require a set of rules to convert from any format to text/HTML, like a2ps has (some sort of mailcap file) manuel, it can be flexible, a parameter to the translator as to what should be done with each formats and there's no convenient way to convert ODT to text AFAIK, you need to use ooffice with a batch program, which you need to provide too well that's really complex manuel, well how will you send me a CD by post? manuel, or say a bed? manuel, courier or parcel, right? so attachment is fine sure but you'll add a note saying "this is a bed from Praveen" why not add a note to such a mail you could even move multiple files simultaneously to the mail translator hm so how is the translator supposed to know that all the files I move are to be sent in a single mail and not on separate mails? and how'll you be able to add a note to such a mail? I mean, of course you can set it on the xattr but that's quite strange (the attachment is supposed to be an attr of the mail, not the other way) and not convenient at all I'm quite sure using a MUA is still easier you could move a complete directory to the mail trans (and the desktop icon can do this transparently) hmm so you have to create a directory, write a text file on it (with a special filename, I guess, since you could also have text files as attachments) and add the attachments to the directory and then drag & drop it * manuel thinks things are getting more and more complicated :) the special file name or attribute thing is right but you not necisirily need to create a dir s/necisirily/necessarily/ you just drag 'n' drop multiple files to the icon and how is the translator supposed to know they are dragged at the same time and not one after the other? I do not know if it is viable * antrik (n=olaf@port-212-202-210-130.dynamic.qsc.de) has joined #hurd AFACS, dragging multiple files just make the desktop issue multiple rename() manuel: however the desktop handles that - it would be a rather easy thing to fix, i guess. * schlesix has quit (Remote closed the connection) moritz: how is the desktop supposed to handle that? if this mail translator approach, is primarily to be used in desktop environments, one could implement the whole thing on the desktop environment layer, not with Hurd translators. manuel: i think it would be rather easy for the desktop to distinguish between actions like "ONE file is dragged" and "MULTIPLE files are dragged". * schlesix (n=schlesix@xdsl-81-173-230-219.netcologne.de) has joined #hurd oh yeah, but then you loose the transparency, and there's no point in making it a translator. I think we agree on that :) i see rather little point in making it a translator anyway, since only god knows wether we have similar concept to translators in hurd-ng. yeah sure, but praveen wasn't planning it for HurdNG AIUI in that case it would probably be toy project. fine. i need to do some maths. see you. hmm well, you can't write anything else than toy projects, then moritz: you shouldn't be too sure about success of ngHurg it is an experiment sdschulze: ping * antrik has quit (Remote closed the connection) * antrik (n=olaf@port-212-202-210-130.dynamic.qsc.de) has joined #hurd * bddebian (n=bdefrees@71.224.172.103) has joined #hurd manuel, This is a lot of input, let me sink these all first :-) Heya folks heya bddebian! it is ofcoures a "nice to have" feature. These are quite intersting inputs as well Hi schlesix manual in the real wprld how will you send multiple things, say you want to send a CD and a bed manuel, you will package it (files) and then one parcel containing all these things (folder) j4v4m4n: well you want to make sending emails easier than sending real mails :-) manuel, it won't substitute MUAs manuel, we need it as the backend geekoe: You asked about GFS yesterday; well, glibc compiled. :) I've not done much more after that. regarding mail translator: take a look at Plan9, they have been doing it for years manuel, sorry not MUA I meant MTA * syamajala (n=syamajal@c-24-147-61-120.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) has joined #hurd ah yes sure, but MUA will still be easier to use afaics manuel, people who are used to Windows say GNU/Linux is tough to use manuel, but when they start with GNOME or KDE they don't have any issues antrik, that is a great info I will look into it manuel, sorry not MUA I meant MTA * syamajala (n=syamajal@c-24-147-61-120.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) has joined #hurd ah yes sure, but MUA will still be easier to use afaics manuel, people who are used to Windows say GNU/Linux is tough to use manuel, but when they start with GNOME or KDE they don't have any issues antrik, that is a great info I will look into it j4v4m4n: they do it quite differently this doesn't answer to the basic question: how is it better than what we have now manuel, it is different, better is always debatable manuel, GNOME might work for but some doesn't use X at all manuel, whether it is good will be depending on the implemetation people who used to GNU/Linux say Windows is tough to use +are GNU/Linux is at least tougher to say no, people have less experience with GNU/Linux "to say", Jeroen manuel, better and easier are always relative manuel, there a lot of people still using mutt when you have thunderbird well because they have reasons to say mutt is easier than thunderbird the only thing is that you've to learn a few shortcuts when you want to use mutt, you can't just click around manuel, exactly manuel, consider this, you want to send a document across to someone * Blackmore has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) * koollman has quit (Remote closed the connection) manuel, now you open a MUA add the attachment send it * koollman (n=samson_t@gsv95-1-82-233-13-27.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #hurd manuel, if you just have to drag it to an icon, would that be easier? * Casanova (n=prash@unaffiliated/casanova) has joined #hurd manuel, chmod +to:manuel@somehost doc.pdf ; cp doc.pdf postbox/ yeah chmod is for setting permissions... manuel, I am not sure how to set xattr well, setfattr well manuel, ok how do you type your subject? and there message itself? s/there/the/ how do you encrypt+sign it with pgp? j4v4m4n: well the problem is still the same you know. OK for to/subject : they'd be extended attributes. but how do you type the message itself? I don't think using xattr for such stuff is a good idea after all, it's not a property of the document antrik, we can use it only on a particular directory on which our translator sit manuel, create a folder that'd mean mkdir message; ln -s doc.pdf message/; cat >message/message < the reason why having translators for such stuff is that this way you have a generic service for sending mail, whether you use it through a special UI (MUA), directly with file commands, from a script, or from some other program that just sends mails as a side functionality * mheath has quit (Connection reset by peer) manuel, that looks scary :-( not sure it's easier than "mutt; m; mmenal@hurdfr.org; document; >typing the message<; a; doc.pdf; y" manuel: it is easier in some situations (and again, I would not use xattr for such stuff) manuel, now how do you use mutt on GNOME? in fact, Plan9 explicitely does *not* have any xattr and stuff antrik: well xattr on the directory that represents the message is not illogical * mheath (n=mheath@c-67-182-231-23.hsd1.co.comcast.net) has joined #hurd antrik, may be we can think of some other way if you don't wanna xattr j4v4m4n: well I just used the CLI because it's easier to describe, but try to explain the steps in a GUI and you'll see it's the same problem manuel, right click on desktop -> create folder -> drag the files to the folder -> set attributes to the folder-> drag it to postbox manuel, it is quite logical step sure, but how is it easier than click on the MUA icon -> create mail -> drag the files to the mail window ; type the attrbutes + contents ; click on send mail looks quite similar to me :-) manuel, or if you already have the folder just drag it a POP or IMAP translator would be more useful IMHO (but well, I didn't read all the backlog, so I may be off topic) manuel, you don't have a MUA here :-) just files and folders to read mails, I mean kilobug, that is even easier IMAP->mabox and then mboxfs j4v4m4n: well you have a MUA : that's the translator kilobug, mboxfs is already available kilobug, I think someone already wrote IMAP to mbox as well but couldn't find it j4v4m4n: well, imapfs could work both way, writing changes on the imap server too ;) manuel: the difference is not how it is used; the difference is how it is implemented manuel: if you have a generic mail translator, you have most functionality already there with the file manager; all you need to add is some scripts for better comfort j4v4m4n: the way I would do it (and I guess Plan9 does, though I haven't checked) is either having a file in the mail directory with the headers, or a subdirectory with a single file for each header (probably the latter) antrik, that would make it too complicated IMHO, it would be close to how it is for snail mail j4v4m4n: I don't see how this would be more complicated than xattr manuel, you can write your own scripts to automate it for whatver way you want * azor (n=azor@62-43-135-201.user.ono.com) has joined #hurd antrik: having the functionality in the filesystem is useful because programs can use this functionality without patching; the protocol to use the mail translator is so specific that you either need to be a real user (but then a MUA is a lot more useful) or have a patched program (but then you could use a lib) antrik, right clicking a file and setting u p to and subject seems easier that creating more files j4v4m4n: I don't think so. maybe it is in gnome, but than I'd consider it a shortcoming of gnome j4v4m4n: in shell "cat foo@example.invalid headers/to" is about as simple as you can get > erm... I mean echo and >, yes sorry * yoj (n=jao@200.163.8.72) has joined #hurd "echo foo@example.invalid > headers/to" is not easier than "setfattr -n to -v foo@example.invalid" AFAICS. echo foo@example.invalid >headers/to * yoj (n=jao@200.163.8.72) has left #hurd * yoj (n=jao@200.163.8.72) has joined #hurd manuel: it is a tiny bit if your "foo@example.invalid" is the output of a command, mycomplexcommand > headers/to is a bit easier than setfattr -n to -v `mycomplexcommand` manuel: but it's the same for a value you type directly manuel: objectively it is not simpler, but it uses a generic mechanism users now well, instead of obscure xattr stuff know well antrik, ok we can think of that, but how about a desktop user? abeaumont andar antrik arnau azeem azor antrik, he has to use more clicks and more head aches antrik, just right click and add to address and subject just you write on the envelop j4v4m4n: that's good ! it makes him buy more medicine, drug corporations will sponsor you then ! * kilobug runs away * j4v4m4n chases kilobug kilobug, better way would be making outlook run on GNU :-) Or GNU on outlook \o/ * yoj (n=jao@200.163.8.72) has left #hurd this channel is becoming insnae :p kilobug, or is it the members ?? :-) I agree with kilobug, we should stop those weirdos here :-/ * whr` (i=whr@acy238.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) has joined #hurd hm... anyone have the marcus quote at hand? i got to go as well bye bye j4v4m4n ## Interesting?? Join the project -- Add yourself to the list below * [[Praveen A]]