From 272a3459d4c22258d637115c20d7c938cf489d32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremie Koenig Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:51:17 +0200 Subject: user/jkoenig/java/discussion: comment on CNI --- user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'user') diff --git a/user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn b/user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn index d7c8548d..352f6d62 100644 --- a/user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn +++ b/user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ is not important, but performance is. Probably faster than JNI, but only usable with GCJ. +> Given that we have very few JNI calls, +> it might be interesting to take a "dual" approach +> if CNI actually improves performance +> when compiling to native code. +> --[[jkoenig]] 2011-07-20 # IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-07-13 -- cgit v1.2.3