From a65f14df8e3d93f71acf276fb0773d6557b9fbab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:44:34 +0100 Subject: IRC bits. --- open_issues/wayland.mdwn | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) create mode 100644 open_issues/wayland.mdwn (limited to 'open_issues/wayland.mdwn') diff --git a/open_issues/wayland.mdwn b/open_issues/wayland.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..67f78b1d --- /dev/null +++ b/open_issues/wayland.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_porting]] + +IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-18: + + Wayland should be very portable. all the system dependencies are + in the infrastructure, such as DRI + we have had a DRI task (for X.Org) for years + (in fact I would be the right person to implement this, + considering my background -- by quite frankly, I doubt I'll ever do it) + http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/Hurd_Porting + +IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-20: + + Is wayland something that will be semi-easy to port to the + hurd? I saw GNOME is heading in this direction. + wayland at the moment is linux only + youlysses: A DRI implementation will be needed. + that, and libdrm compiling + So it will take some work ... but theres no *HUGE* design + decison that would inhibit it? + i know it uses epoll, for instance + youlysses: I cannot judge how complex a DRI system is, and how + much needs to be designed vs. implemented. -- cgit v1.2.3