From 95878586ec7611791f4001a4ee17abf943fae3c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://me.yahoo.com/a/g3Ccalpj0NhN566pHbUl6i9QF0QEkrhlfPM-#b1c14" Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:08:03 +0100 Subject: rename open_issues.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663.mdwn --- open_issues/libnetfs_passive_translators.mdwn | 55 --------------------------- 1 file changed, 55 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 open_issues/libnetfs_passive_translators.mdwn (limited to 'open_issues/libnetfs_passive_translators.mdwn') diff --git a/open_issues/libnetfs_passive_translators.mdwn b/open_issues/libnetfs_passive_translators.mdwn deleted file mode 100644 index c89d27f7..00000000 --- a/open_issues/libnetfs_passive_translators.mdwn +++ /dev/null @@ -1,55 +0,0 @@ -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] - -[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable -id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this -document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or -any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant -Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license -is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation -License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] - -[[!tag open_issue_hurd]] - - -# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-07-15 - - is there a libnetfs based translator that supports passive - translators? - I don't see any at the top of my head, only with active ones such - as hostmux - I suspected as much since as far as I can tell libnetfs lacks - some bits to make that even work - teythoon: the problem with passive translators is persistence - well, it's easy to store volatile passive translators in a - libnetfs server - but usually, there is no backing store for them - ext2fs is the only one actually providing space to store their - command line - sure, but at least file_get_translator needs to work so that - procfs can serve a mounts node - silly idea but - don't you want to directly add it to the procfs translator ? - no, I think it's useful on its own - ok - then you may need to add the required support - it even doubles as normal command line tool - yes, I almost got it... or so I hope ;) - ok - also, netfs_get_translator exists, so not supporting that feels - like a bug to me - could also be useful for a potential devfs translator - yes - - uh, the code duplication in lib*fs is really bad :/ - the code is mostly similar, though they have diverged and many - little things are different so diffing them is very noisy - stuff like file names or identifiers - and I cannot figure out why my shiny passive translators are not - started :/ - % showtrans tmp/mounts - /hurd/mtab.fixed / - % wc --bytes tmp/mounts - 0 tmp/mounts - and no mtab translator around either - -[[hurd/translator/mtab/discussion]]. -- cgit v1.2.3