From d1b0d62ad9ffa33919a2997f0a9a79dddc09cee1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:48:59 +0100 Subject: IRC bits. --- open_issues/libnetfs_io_map.mdwn | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) create mode 100644 open_issues/libnetfs_io_map.mdwn (limited to 'open_issues/libnetfs_io_map.mdwn') diff --git a/open_issues/libnetfs_io_map.mdwn b/open_issues/libnetfs_io_map.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b340de90 --- /dev/null +++ b/open_issues/libnetfs_io_map.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!meta title="libnetfs: io_map"]] + +[[!tag open_issue_hurd]] + +This hampers [[hurd/translator/nfs]] usability, for example. + +IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-14: + + i just realized that ld.so uses mmap unconditionally + so executables or shared libs can't be used off a netfs-based + file system + that's annoying + civodul: Do you know what it takes to fix libnetfs? I have no + idea. + Never looked at it. + tschwinge: implementing io_map + but i think the idea is that io_map typically isn't convenient + for network file systems + which is why it doesn't have it + the GCS says "thou shall not require mmap" ;-) -- cgit v1.2.3