From 7eecc9b75ce4867597f2dc404182bb04f7fe2145 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:57:35 +0100 Subject: hurd/ng/resource_management_problems -> microkernel/mach/gnumach/open_issues/resource_management_problems --- hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn') diff --git a/hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn b/hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn index 03795dc4..d4daeefa 100644 --- a/hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn +++ b/hurd/history/port_to_l4.mdwn @@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ explains: > Before Marcus and I considered [[microkernel/Coyotos]], we had already > rejected some parts of the Hurd's design. The -> [[ng/resource_management_problems]] were what prompted me to look at L4. -> Also, some of the problems with [[translator]]s were already well-known to -> us. (For a more detailed description of the problems we have identified, see -> our [[critique]] in the 2007 July's SIGOPS OSR. We have also written a -> forward-looking [[ng/position_paper]].) +> [[microkernel/mach/gnumach/open_issues/resource_management_problems]] were +> what prompted me to look at L4. Also, some of the problems with +> [[translator]]s were already well-known to us. (For a more detailed +> description of the problems we have identified, see our [[critique]] in the +> 2007 July's SIGOPS OSR. We have also written a forward-looking +> [[ng/position_paper]].) > We visited Jonathan Shapiro at Hopkins in January 2006. This resulted in a > number of discussions, some quite influential, and not always in a way which -- cgit v1.2.3