From a3cbf7911c321951adfe60640a93d72999150273 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: antrik Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:07:03 +0100 Subject: history/port_to_another_microkernel (discussion): comment on the recent merge --- history/port_to_another_microkernel/discussion.mdwn | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) (limited to 'history/port_to_another_microkernel') diff --git a/history/port_to_another_microkernel/discussion.mdwn b/history/port_to_another_microkernel/discussion.mdwn index f2161195..6af8ac53 100644 --- a/history/port_to_another_microkernel/discussion.mdwn +++ b/history/port_to_another_microkernel/discussion.mdwn @@ -8,6 +8,18 @@ Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] +I can't say that I like the merge of FAQ entry an Hurd/L4 page. The stuff taken +from the L4 page creates the impression that Mach is a relic that we urgently +need to get rid of -- an impression I carefully tried to avoid in my own +writeup. Also, it's way too long IMHO. (In fact my own writeup is already on +the fringe of being too wordy I fear.) And I don't think that bare links to +other pages make good FAQ answers in general. + +IMHO the original FAQ entry should be restored (with some details fixed); while +the Hurd/L4 page can be referenced for further details. + +-- antrik + IRC, #hurd, 2011-01-12. [[!taglink open_issue_documentation]] -- cgit v1.2.3