From 38cfa89677eabc85fc23e31e24cee85fb1ecfa54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 10:36:54 +0200 Subject: Rework FAQ machinery to be based on tags instead of filenames. --- faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) create mode 100644 faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn (limited to 'faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn') diff --git a/faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn b/faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..37050763 --- /dev/null +++ b/faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag faq/support]] + + +# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-01-13 + +[[!tag open_issue_documentation]] + + sothere's absolutelyno way,evenslowly to run i386 linuxcode + under hurd/i386? Ihave a small app, commercial, which I have to get + running there + no source + no way + you'd need to create a userspace linux server catching linux + system calls and calling hurd specific stuff to implement them + it doesn't exist, it may be hard to implement + some cases will definitely be hard to implement + so, no magic linux lxemu on windows? + or linuxemu on plan9 + nope + I remember somethingsilly, sonmone hadcompiled linux asauser + applicationon plan9 and inserted his own binaries as + acodeobject,toberunon plan9, for useon ibm hpc hatrdware + it was ron minich + 5e.iwp9.org/slides/linuxemu.pdf + I think that was it + google for linux & cnk for additional clues -- cgit v1.2.3