From 025dac132f2da52e7a83429b5bcf7e879bb10f0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlyLVajq_XluZ1wvTunv9vbM_kx1H0nd6Q" Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:59:53 +0100 Subject: Correct a confusing statement about the threading model --- open_issues/anatomy_of_a_hurd_system.mdwn | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/open_issues/anatomy_of_a_hurd_system.mdwn b/open_issues/anatomy_of_a_hurd_system.mdwn index 3e585876..a461d71b 100644 --- a/open_issues/anatomy_of_a_hurd_system.mdwn +++ b/open_issues/anatomy_of_a_hurd_system.mdwn @@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ Need more stuff like that. is it M:N ? libthreads, actually yes + +Actually, the Hurd has never used an M:N model. Both libthreads (cthreads) and libpthread use an 1:1 model. + nice is the task scheduler in the kernel ? the kernel thread scheduler, yes, of course -- cgit v1.2.3