summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn80
1 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn b/open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn
index 2d273ba1..66da44b9 100644
--- a/open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn
+++ b/open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn
@@ -57,3 +57,83 @@ the [[microkernel/mach/gnumach/ports/Xen]] platform.
and switching to long mode, then jumping to c code to complete the
initialization
<braunr> i think i'll go the second way with x15, so you'll have the two :)
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-12-12
+
+In context of [[microkernel/mach/gnumach/memory_management]].
+
+ <tschwinge> Or with a 64-bit one? ;-P
+ <braunr> tschwinge: i think we all had that idea in mind :)
+ <pinotree> tschwinge: patches welcome :P
+ <youpi> tschwinge: sure, please help us settle down with the mig stuff
+ <youpi> what was blocking me was just deciding how to do it
+ <braunr> hum, what's blocking x86_64, except time to work on it ?
+ <youpi> deciding the mig types & such things
+ <youpi> i.e. the RPC ABI
+ <braunr> ok
+ <braunr> easy answer: keep it the same
+ <youpi> sorry, let me rephrase
+ <youpi> decide what ABI is supposed to be on a 64bit system, so as to know
+ which way to rewrite the types of the kernel MIG part to support 64/32
+ conversion
+ <braunr> can't this be done in two steps ?
+ <youpi> well, it'd mean revamping the whole kernel twice
+ <youpi> as the types at stake are referenced in the whole RPC code
+ <braunr> the first step i imagine would simply imply having an x86_64
+ kernel for 32-bits userspace, without any type change (unless restricting
+ to 32-bits when a type is automatically enlarged on 64-bits)
+ <youpi> it's not so simple
+ <youpi> the RPC code is tricky
+ <youpi> and there are alignments things that RPC code uses
+ <youpi> which become different when build with a 64bit compiler
+ <pinotree> there are also things like int[N] for io_stat_struct and so on
+ <braunr> i see
+ <youpi> making the code wrong for 32
+ <youpi> thus having to change the types
+ <youpi> pinotree: yes
+ <pinotree> (doesn't mig support structs, or it is too clumsy to be used in
+ practice?)
+ <braunr> pinotree: what's the problem with that (i explcitely said changing
+ int to e.g. int32_t)
+ <youpi> that won't fly for some of the calls
+ <youpi> e.g. getting a thread state
+ <braunr> pinotree: no it doesn't support struct
+ <pinotree> braunr: that some types in struct stat are long, for instance
+ <braunr> pinotree: same thing with longs
+ <braunr> youpi: why wouldn't it ?
+ <youpi> that wouldn't work on a 64bit system
+ <youpi> so we can't make it int32_t in the interface definition
+ <braunr> i understand the alignment issues and that the mig code adjusts
+ the generated code, but not the content of what is transfered
+ <braunr> well of course
+ <braunr> i'm talking about the first step here
+ <braunr> which targets a 32-bits userspace only
+ <youpi> ok, so we agree
+ <youpi> the second step would have to revamp the whole RPC code again
+ <braunr> i imagine the first to be less costly
+ <braunr> well, actually no
+ <braunr> you're right, the mig stuff would be easy on the application side,
+ but more complicated on the kernel side, since it would really mean
+ dealing with 64-bits values there
+ <braunr> (unless we keep a 3/1 split instead of giving the full 4g to
+ applications)
+
+See also [[microkernel/mach/gnumach/memory_management]].
+
+ <youpi> (I don't see what that changes)
+ <braunr> if the kernel still runs with 32-bits addresses, everything it
+ recevies from or sends through mig can be stored with the user side
+ 32-bits types
+ <youpi> err, ok, but what's the point of the 64bit kernel then ? :)
+ <braunr> and it simply uses 64-bits addresses to deal with physical memory
+ <youpi> ok
+ <youpi> that could even be a 3.5/0.5 split then
+ <braunr> but the memory model forces us to run either at the low 2g or the
+ highest ones
+ <youpi> but linux has 3/1, so we don't need that
+ <braunr> otherwise we need an mcmodel=medium
+ <braunr> we could do with mcmodel=medium though, for a time
+ <braunr> hm actually no, it would require mcmodel=large
+ <braunr> hum, that's stupid, we can make the kernel run at -2g, and use 3g
+ up to the sign extension hole for the kernel map