summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn b/faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a2740abc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/faq/why_so_few_developers.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
+
+[[!meta title="Why are there so few developers working on the GNU
+Hurd?"]]
+
+[[There aren't working a lot of people on the GNU
+Hurd|how_many_developers]]. Why is this?
+
+We can only speculate. One major problem might be that the
+[[architectural benefits|advantages]] are generally perceived as very
+abstract, with little practical benefits. We don't have many tools to
+present actually making use of the possibilities.
+
+Another reason is that it's been taking too long. Most people don't
+believe it will ever be ready for production use, and thus would consider
+involvement a waste of time. This latter point is invalid, of course, as
+learning can never be a waste of time. The same holds for the
+[[challenges]] raised by the GNU Hurd -- we can only learn and improve
+upon working on them.