summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn25
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn b/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0d722c9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
+
+[[!tag open_issue_documentation]]
+
+\#hurd IRC channel on Freenode, 2010-12-21:
+
+ <antrik> tschwinge: the writeup ignores the fact that POSIX compatibility
+ is not only for applications, but also for users familiar with the UNIX
+ environment
+ <antrik> also, I still don't buy the fact that most software is not written
+ for POSIX. even if assuming that GNOME programs don't use POSIX (which is
+ only half true), there is a lot of other software in a system that is
+ just as important, though less visible
+ <antrik> (server software, startup system, device management, automation,
+ ...)
+ <antrik> tschwinge: BTW, I meant to (and partially did) write a blog
+ article on this topic -- but I didn't get around to finish it...