|author||Thomas Schwinge <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2012-03-20 22:44:34 +0100|
|committer||Thomas Schwinge <email@example.com>||2012-03-20 22:44:34 +0100|
Diffstat (limited to 'open_issues/wayland.mdwn')
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/wayland.mdwn b/open_issues/wayland.mdwn
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-18:
+ <antrik> Wayland should be very portable. all the system dependencies are
+ in the infrastructure, such as DRI
+ <antrik> we have had a DRI task (for X.Org) for years
+ <antrik> (in fact I would be the right person to implement this,
+ considering my background -- by quite frankly, I doubt I'll ever do it)
+ <tschwinge> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/Hurd_Porting
+IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-20:
+ <youlysses> Is wayland something that will be semi-easy to port to the
+ hurd? I saw GNOME is heading in this direction.
+ <pinotree> wayland at the moment is linux only
+ <tschwinge> youlysses: A DRI implementation will be needed.
+ <pinotree> that, and libdrm compiling
+ <youlysses> So it will take some work ... but theres no *HUGE* design
+ decison that would inhibit it?
+ <pinotree> i know it uses epoll, for instance
+ <tschwinge> youlysses: I cannot judge how complex a DRI system is, and how
+ much needs to be designed vs. implemented.