[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] [[!taglink open_issue_documentation]]: update [[sound]] page. # IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-09-01 I'm new to the hurd but I'd love to learn enough to work on sound support. http://darnassus.sceen.net/~hurd-web/community/gsoc/project_ideas/sound/ says drivers should be ported to GNU Mach as a first step. Is this information still current or should the existing Linux driver be wrapped with DDE instead? if i recall correctly dde is currently only being used for network drivers. i'm not sure how much work would be involved for sound or usb ## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-09-02 The sound support proposal (http://darnassus.sceen.net/~hurd-web/community/gsoc/project_ideas/sound/) recommends porting some other kernel's sound driver to GNU Mach. Is this still current or should DDE be used instead? rekado: dde or anything userspace-based is generally preferred rekado: both are about porting some other kernel's sound driver dde is preferred yes This email says that sound drivers are already partly working with DDE: http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/pipermail/l4-hackers/2009/004291.html So, should I just try to get some ALSA kernel parts to compile with DDE? well, what is missing is also the dde←→hurd glue rekado: there is also a problem with pci arbitration pinotree: I assumed DDEKit works with the hurd and we could use any DDE/ glue code with it * rekado looks up pci arbitration only for networking atm ah, I see.